Social Science Fraud

s Young people have been taught that sex and race are social constructs. They are actually biological constructs. I once saw a video of women storming out of an auditorium when a woman biologist told them that men were “taller than woman”. They went nuts and smashed the audio system on the way out. This happened at a college campus.

I remember a recent video with a young, smart, black man who was an assistant editor with The Atlantic Magazine who said, “Race is a social construct, not a genetic one.” They say genetic difference vary more within one race than between different races, while they ignore the fact that whites evolved to safely drink milk because they lacked sunshine and needed vitamin D, and blacks are prone to sickle cell anemia.

Blacks have more of a better muscle type that helps in sports. Racial differences are good, it’s basic evolution that we become genetically superior or inferior. While race is said to be a social construct, winning the game of life isn’t. We are all unequal and should be treated equally. You can’t wish luck in the game of life away. Politicizing science won’t do that because it’s bullshit, and most people can see through it, except for social scientists. They’re too “educated” and  superior to normies – unironically so.

It’s like when a scientists says half of all child rapes are not done by pedophiles, because pedos are sexually attracted to children, by definition, and many child rapes are done out of sadism. If that’s the case, then redefine pedophilia to include sadists, like normal people do.

Race = Social Construct: 
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/reich-genetics-racism/558818/

Young people believe in the science they want, not the science they need. Any attempt by me to expose science fraud on social media (Reddit = CNN = The Onion) is doomed from the get-go, but I never let that stop me, I can’t play the guitar or sing, but I do it all the time.

There are pseudo-science stories out there about how 100% of our energy will be renewable within 20 years, when there has never been a 100% energy transition of any kind, in all of human history. Wood was the very first human fuel. Europe gets 50% of its “renewable energy” by burning wood and ignoring the emissions, because the trees will grow back in 50 years they say. Sweden burns garbage to heat their cities and they call it “recycled energy”. They actually burn stuff that could be recycled.

Science has become politicized and it can no longer be trusted.

The Link:

The Conspiracy of Scientific Fraud = 70% of Experiments Cannot Be Replicated, 50% of Researchers Cannot Reproduce Their Own Results

The Link Text:

1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility

https://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970

Delusion: Swiss Bank Says Free Renewables By 2030 – thenextweb.com

https://thenextweb.com/insider/2018/08/14/analyst-renewable-will-be-effectively-free-by-2030/

The above link is fake news. You may remember when banks said collateralized debt obligations were way too much for our pretty little heads to understand, which was of course, just before the financial collapse.

Is the Peer Review Process a Scam? – enago academy

https://www.enago.com/academy/is-peer-review-process-a-scam/

“In 2005, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) created a software program called SCIgen that randomly combined strings of words to generate fake computer science papers. The objective of the exercise was to prove that the peer review process was fundamentally flawed and the conferences and journals would accept meaningless papers. After being notified by other researchers who were tracking those SCIgen papers, journals were still quietly pulling articles as late as 2014.”

I remember a story about French post-modern philosophers in the 1970s, who received a document from a renowned physicist who pranked them. He took all their, what Chomsky calls, unintelligibly garbled reasonings, and he rearranged and regurgitated all their fine words and blessed them with a kiss. That kiss was a tacit endorsement of their reasoning. They forgot to verify what the physicist said before publishing it.

Let’s end reviewer fraud – Publons

https://publons.com/blog/lets-end-reviewer-fraud/

107 cancer papers retracted due to peer review fraud | Ars Technica

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/04/107-cancer-papers-retracted-due-to-peer-review-fraud/

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science – Google Scholar

http://scholar.google.ca/scholar_url?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014107680609900414&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm0D9oaDV4YG6rsHdvwE8ygJ8b4dgA&nossl=1&oi=scholarr

Why scientists need to do more about research fraud – Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2018/jan/04/science-fraud-research-misconduct

Canadian researchers who commit scientific fraud are protected by privacy laws – The Toronto Star

https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2018/jan/04/science-fraud-research-misconduct

China cracks down after investigation finds massive peer-review fraud – science mag

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/china-cracks-down-after-investigation-finds-massive-peer-review-fraud

The Bottom of the Barrel of Science Fraud – Neuroskeptic

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/11/30/worst-science-fraud/

Chinese courts call for death penalty for research fraud – PBS

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/column-chinese-courts-call-death-penalty-researchers-commit-fraud

Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process | NEJM

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1512330

Scientific Fraud – EuroScientist journal

https://www.euroscientist.com/theme/scientific-fraud/

5 Common Types of Pharmaceutical Frauds You Should Know About!

https://community.intelex.com/explore/posts/5-common-types-pharmaceutical-frauds-you-should-know-about

Search for yourself: glyphosate research fraud

 

 

Advertisements
Standard

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s